Microsoft SQL Server Licensing Options

Microsoft SQL Server licensing options are often confusing. The first thing to know is that there are many different licensing types available to choose from. There are a few key factors that impact what type of license is best for your situation. Among the many things to consider are the number of servers and users, how the license is used, and the type of hardware behind the server.

There are two main types of SQL Server licensing models at https://www.directdeals.com/software/microsoft-windows-server?Attribs=5203&. One is a per-host model, while the other is a core-based model. Each of these types has its own pros and cons. Typically, a per-host model is more cost-effective for large organizations, while a core-based model is more appropriate for small businesses. However, depending on the nature of your business and the way you plan to use your SQL Server, one or the other may be the best choice for you.

A per-host license allows you to purchase a license for one virtual machine that runs Microsoft SQL Server. You can also buy a license for a particular physical server, or you can buy a license for a physical server and several virtual machines. Depending on the licensing options you choose, there may be a few extra costs. For instance, if you purchase a SQL Server Enterprise Edition license and also purchase a secondary standby replica of the same version, you will have to pay for the second license. Know more about software at http://www.ehow.com/tech/computer-software/.

Core-based licensing is similar to a per-host model in that you pay for all of the CPU cores on your physical server. If you are looking for a cheaper option, you might want to look at a product from TechSoup, which provides one server with two cores. Alternatively, you can also purchase a two-core pack of the standard edition of SQL Server for $3,944. Having said that, if you need more than two cores, you will have to purchase a second pack.

SQL Server Standard Edition does not require a separate client access license. This is because it can run in a Server + CAL model. This model is a good choice for medium sized workloads, and it is particularly useful when you are unsure of how many user access licenses you will need. It is also an inexpensive solution for smaller businesses that are not ready to invest in a whole new server.

Another licensing type is a mixed cal model. This is the most common type of licensing. Generally, it is not recommended to mix a CAL type. Unless you have specific technical requirements for a mixed cal, it is probably not worth your time.

There are other licensing models for SQL Server, such as the AlwaysOn Availability Group. These are useful in that they double the benefits of a normal replication. An AlwaysOn Availability Group requires a primary and secondary license. In addition, it also offers features like a secondary replica and upgrade rights to future versions of SQL Server.